<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out with the Sotec C101, in with the Sotec C102</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netbooklounge.com/2009/01/22/out-with-the-sotec-c101-in-with-the-sotec-c102/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netbooklounge.com/2009/01/22/out-with-the-sotec-c101-in-with-the-sotec-c102/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:04:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Onkyo Japan to follow up on Sotec C102 with C103 - Netbook Lounge</title>
		<link>http://netbooklounge.com/2009/01/22/out-with-the-sotec-c101-in-with-the-sotec-c102/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Onkyo Japan to follow up on Sotec C102 with C103 - Netbook Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netbooklounge.com/?p=635#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t even two months yet since we wrote about Onkyo Japan ousting the Sotec C101 and replacing it with the C102, which offered minor upgrades on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t even two months yet since we wrote about Onkyo Japan ousting the Sotec C101 and replacing it with the C102, which offered minor upgrades on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
